Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Manifesto!

A prescient spirit with the name of Suzanne, whom I have known briefly and hope will become a friend, wrote the following – expressing many of the questions I have had about (arising from) Open Space Technology. I responded to her note (below) with what I might now call – A Manifesto. that is to say a lot of the things I have been thinking and never quite dared to say in on place—so I have said it! Manifesto!


Suzanne --

How can we honor a client’s desired outcome which assumes predictability and control when Open Space invites something quite different? With my limited experience with Open Space (I’ve only done two as an unpaid volunteer) and a long corporate career, my gut tells me that the Open Space way of lighting up passion and responsibility in individuals and collectives will lead to results that far exceed what a client could initially expect. I know because all my life, I’ve seen how much gets accomplished when people are passionate about what they do. Open Space is all about that. Many clients want a clear-cut route to improved results, better service, higher quality, etc. This we cannot promise. Rather, OS is a journey, a new way of doing which means undoing what didn’t work, and seeing what we don’t’ want to see to create what we can’t know.


How can we effectively convey to a client the importance of gut feel and intuition, inviting them to an experience that they must “feel” and not just “think”? The dilemma is that you cannot know Open Space until you’ve done Open Space and not just once. How can you describe what get’s ignited in people when they get to choose (Law of Two Feet), feel Equal and live/work according to principles (4 OS principles) – something that makes so much sense but that is so different than what our current hierarchical world dictates?

Once people are activated in an Open Space way, I think it ignites a longing that is in each of us and the difficulty is that you just don’t want to go back to the old way. How then do we blend traditional and self-organizing?

I struggle with these questions and as I embark on this wild ride of OS, I imagine myself building trust at the beginning of my relationship with clients talking about the issues that they care about and that they know: their business. Hopefully by connecting and being honest, I will establish enough trust so that they will want to try this new way, knowing deep inside them that the old ways aren’t working any more. It’s about finding the courage of our voice and actions, doing this together in a supportive way.

My Response –

Suzanne – You have succinctly posed both the problem and possibilities of Open Space. On the one hand it (OS) violates virtually every principle and practice of the management of organizations. In addition it cannot provide the one thing that most managers/executives seemingly want – certainty and predictability. On the other hand it “works” – often at surprising and breathtaking levels, which itself becomes a problem if only because the results are so far beyond the “standard curve” as to appear outlandish, weird, and to be truthful – like a pure fabrication. Otherwise known as a lie! Nobody in their right mind should be caught in association with such an aberrant phenomenon. Definitely hazardous to your professional health, as it probably is some new cult or religious fantasy, replete with odd dogma and secret handshakes. At least some people seem to think so, and I wouldn’t blame them.

Given all of the above, it is totally remarkable that Open Space is still around to bother people. By all rights it should have been eliminated or at the very least contained. And in fact it is clear that efforts have been made in that regard. The first level of effort might be called The Silent Treatment. It has always been interesting to me that the academic world has essentially ignored Open Space. Virtually no articles, classes or discussion of a phenomenon that has been around for 25 years, with 100,000’s of iterations, appearing in 136 countries. But were you to go to most business schools, “it” never happened. Actually this is not all that surprising because if OS did happen, much of what takes place at the average business school would be open to radical question. This would not be good for employment, tenure, and the continuing collection of (very large) student fees.

A second level of effort is the Containment Strategy, which comes in two forms. First is “Doing a Little Bit of Open Space.” As Open Space gained some degree of popular interest, some thought to give it a try, but with severe limitations, lest it get out of control. This became known as doing a “little bit” of Open Space. In the worst of circumstances it was the same old meeting (closely controlled, highly facilitated, with detailed schedules, and list of guaranteed outcomes) – and with the magic words, “Open Space” whispered quietly at the start.

The second form of the Containment Strategy might be called The Tool-in-the-Box approach. Open Space is described as one more tool for the box – and in my more suspicious moments I rather think that some people would like to keep it in the box as much as possible. By defining OS as a tool it may be equated and compared with other such tools (presumably, Future Search, AI, etc) and used only in the appropriate situations. There is some logic to this strategy for at first glance, OS certainly does look like a tool. But with a little closer inspection the oddity of Open Space as a tool begins to peep through.

In the first place Open Space is ridiculously simple. Sit in a circle, create a bulletin board, open and market place, and go to work. No self respecting group method (large or small) could possibly be that simple! And it gets worse. It is not entirely clear how or why it works. In fact it seems to work pretty much all by itself and the less the facilitator does, the better it works. Obviously this is a tool best left in the box. It is unreliable (un-predictable results), can be “done” by virtually anybody, and has a mind of its own. What sort of irresponsible consultant could possibly choose such a tool – let alone recommend it to a client?

Now we come down to the really sticky wicket. There are some strange people, myself for one, who have come to an understanding that the resolution of the mystery of Open Space (Why it works?) comes from the world of self organizing systems. In short, Open Space works because self-organization works. Or put another way – Open Space is self-organization at work. This sounds like a nice, safe, theoretical premise. But maybe not! Should it turn out that self-organization is a (or the) fundamental mechanism in the ongoing evolution of the cosmos – the whole cosmos including all human systems (us) – then it is ALL open space and choice is not an option. To offer people a choice is to offer a false choice, and to the extent that this choice is offered in order to meet perceived client need to be in control (have predictability and certainty) – we are effectively enabling delusional behavior. We are also offering something we can’t deliver. And that, of course raises certain ethical questions.

Now I am definitely in trouble. But that is what happens when you mess around with Open Space. Welcome Aboard Suzanne!

Harrison

39 comments:

Michael Herman said...

i find the distinction between "tool/technique" and "practice" useful with folks who automatically think "tool".

my point to thems is this: bulletin board, circle, marketplace, invitation... these are the techniques. but os is bigger. and more skillful. a "practice".

i often add that "practice" also implies "5 minutes to learn, lifetime to master" sort of thing. and this dimension of time, long time, repeated time, brings experimentation and learning into the story... bound to have bumps, but true practice requires keeping going, doing again, doing better, which of course usually means doing less and trying less hard. strange practice!

開心唷 said...

上床圖片av圖片免費色情圖台灣性網陰蒂淫妹貼圖色情激突成人論壇成人色情網激情成人聊天室情色影音鹹濕女生自慰影片淫慾自慰色情a片成人色情圖片網情人視訊網成人話題成人色情台灣成人淫蕩a圖片情色留言板女生奶頭情色成人全裸美女圖片情色寫真裸體照大奶子台灣色情成人網站一夜正妹美女裸體寫真g罩杯美女sex520情趣娃娃視訊打槍視訊辣妹uthome淫亂走光照av情色網女生高潮成人自拍火辣眉眉太太陰毛美女視訊聊天全裸入鏡火辣av三點全露

佩璇 said...

以簡單的行為愉悅他人的心靈,勝過千人低頭禱告。........................................

欣盈 said...

I do like ur article~!!!..................................................

嘉雯 said...

I do like ur article~!!!...................................................

MichellSommerville0202 said...

Hello~Nice to meet you~..................................................

向霖 said...

亞洲成人文成人dvd影城線上免費看成人卡通成人色情電影院色情卡通貼圖新中部聊天室新免費成人影片新性愛影片暗黑破壞神程式暗黑程式豦美鳳豦美鳳光碟圖片台灣論壇圖片區85論壇彰化人留言板彰化人聊天事彰化交友聊天室彰化聊天是熊熊貼圖區熊貓[情色貼圖熊貓av貼圖熊貓人貼圖熊貓人圖片熊貓人影片熊貓天堂圖片85論壇嘟嘟線上影片觀賞嘟嘟網線上免費a片豦美鳳性愛光碟嘟ㄉ成人網視訊聊天室 免費視訊 聊天免費視訊

雅威 said...

信心是命運的主宰!! trust yourself!!! ....................................................

DamionHallam3216 said...

只用微笑說話的人,才能擔當重任。........................................

BenWann1259 said...

謝謝您的分享~感恩唷!!..................................................

涂HerthaSic said...

I love readding, and thanks for your artical. ..............................

韋于倫成 said...

一棵樹除非在春天開了花,否則難望在秋天結果。.........................

韋于倫成 said...

Necessity is the mother of invention..........................

韋于倫成 said...

Make yourself necessary to someone..........................

韋于倫成 said...

Every dog has his day. ....................................................

于呈均名 said...

健康的身體是事業成功的基礎。 ............................................................

Burma家銘ege said...

More haste, less speed.............................................................

walsha said...

Cast not the first stone. ........................................

定治定治 said...

Many a true word is spoken in jest...................................................................

萱祥 said...

真是太有道理了~~我支持你~~~.................................................................

茹順茹順 said...

pleasure to find such a good artical! please keep update!!.................................................................

貞合 said...

要保持更新呦,加油!!!期待你的新文章!!!.................................................................                           

珮陽 said...

當一個人內心能容納兩樣相互衝突的東西,這個人便開始變得有價值了。............................................................

陳延doraramirezDGD尹 said...

人有兩眼一舌,是為了觀察倍於說話的緣故。............................................................

JasonBirk佳琪 said...

當一個人內心能容納兩樣相互衝突的東西,這個人便開始變得有價值了。............................................................

恩如 said...

開心不開心都是一天,祝您能夠笑著面對一切!............................................................

LeeO_Capetillo淑屏 said...

文章雖然普通,但意義卻很大~~^^~~ ..................................................................

倫惟倫惟 said...

文章是心情的反應~~祝妳天天寫的都是讓人開心的好文章哦!!...............................................................

玉婷良DGFHFJ瑋黃吳 said...

very popular to u!..................................................................

祐音祐音 said...

你的文章給我力量!感謝您!!!............................................................

王美妹 said...

人並不是生來要吃敗仗的。人可被毀滅,但不可被擊倒。.................................................................

ToryO_Vis建銘 said...

Look before you leap.................................................

怡謝伶 said...

Learning makes a good man better and ill man worse.............................................................

誠陳侑 said...

知識可以傳授,智慧卻不行。每個人必須成為他自己。. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

王辛江淑萍康 said...

生命所經歷的折磨愈多,其所產生的奮鬥力愈大。................. ................................................

幸平平平平杰 said...

每次看完你的文章,總是回味許久,要經常發表喔。..................................................

佳張張張張燕張張張張張 said...

Judge not a book by its cover.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

瑰潼 said...

幸福不是一切,人還有責任。..................................................... ............

司冯欣 said...

所有的資產,在不被諒解時,都成了負債...........................................................